UMR Communications
 
SiteWeb

Home

Contact Us

UMR Staff

News Archive




About the Reporter

Letters to the Editor

Reporter Blog

Subscriptions

About UMR

Print Products

Advertising Info

Customer Care

Communicators Conference

Books and Journals



Links

Classifieds



UMPortal Store


UMR Communications is offering the latest headlines
in the RSS format.

RSS
Want weekly Sneak Previews?



Email Marketing
by VerticalResponse

Send This Page
To A Friend
 
 
 

  Reviews
BOOK REVIEW: Leaving ‘mainline’ mindset behind

Andrew C. Thompson, Nov 7, 2008


By Andrew C. Thompson
Special Contributor

Mainline or Methodist? Rediscovering Our Evangelistic Mission
Scott Kisker
Discipleship Resources, 2008
128 pages, paperback

Is “mainline” a bad word? 

United Methodists are familiar with the description of their church as a “mainline.” Scott Kisker wants them to rethink that label. 

Dr. Kisker, a professor at Wesley Theological Seminary in Washington, D.C., has written widely in the area of Methodist history and evangelism. In Mainline or Methodist? he takes dead aim at a church that has sought far too long to conform itself to the larger American culture. 

The book summarizes some of the central ideas of Wesleyan Methodism: the importance of holy living, the assurance of the Holy Spirit, the centrality of grace in all we can experience in the Christian life. Early on, these elements were all understood as part of a great evangelistic mission into which God had called the Methodist people. 

But Dr. Kisker pulls no punches in describing how Methodists eventually began to strive for mainline respectability. 

Methodism’s “fall,” he says, started when Methodists became more interested in respectability and conformity to the culture than to the mission they had been given. “Mainline” is thus an identity that cares more about worldly success than evangelistic mission. And Dr. Kisker sees it as a betrayal of Methodism’s true purpose; his goal is to help us get back on the right track. 

He explains original Methodist concepts and structures in terms that contemporary church folk can understand and appreciate. He invites us to see the Wesleyan concept of salvation as an ongoing process that begins in the here-and-now and extends to the afterlife. 

For instance: “Salvation, in a Wesleyan context, is not simply forgiveness, it is not simply a get-out-of-jail-free card. Rather, it is the complete restoration of who we have been created to be, here and now, in this life.” 

Likewise, the original Methodist practices of open-air preaching, band and class meetings and annual conferences are described as geared toward helping people to understand repentance, justification by faith and the call to holy living. 

These meanings have been lost today. Dr. Kisker writes, “As I go around and attend United Methodist churches, what strikes me is the way in which most of them (not all) are limited by what passes for possible in this world. United Methodists do not expect God’s Spirit to intervene in powerful ways—to win the battle for us. As a result, we are resigned to the way things are.” 

Ultimately though, the book sounds a hopeful note. We are just as called to “spread scriptural holiness” across the land today as we always were. The only thing stopping us is the inertia of settling so long for mainline respectability. 

But—and according to Dr. Krisker this is crucially important—we still have the theological and practical resources in our very own tradition to turn things around. 

In the final chapter, he provides an excellent starting point for conversations about mission and ministry in local churches. There are sections on how best to move forward according to a truly Methodist mission, presented in a way that individuals and small groups will find easy to use. Questions for each section are offered as well. This book is highly recommended for use in local church settings. 

One distraction: Some of the book is poorly edited, including numerous misspelled words and a consistent tendency to render George Whitefield’s name as Whitfield. However these are only minor slights against an otherwise strong work.

The Rev. Thompson maintains a blog at www.genxrising.com. e-mail: andrew@mandatum.org.

Share
Print
Email to a friend:   
Other articles by Andrew C. Thompson:
GEN-X RISING: Sheep and shepherds in ministry (Aug 4, 2010)
GEN-X RISING: Wimbledon final teaches a bit about discipleship (Jul 21, 2010)
GEN-X RISING: Hearing Gospel told as story brings Scripture to new life (Jul 7, 2010)
GEN-X RISING: On restructuring the church: a less-complex path forward (Jun 23, 2010)
GEN-X RISING: Conferencing time (Jun 9, 2010)

Other articles in Reviews category:
FILM REVIEW: Sci-fi blockbuster ‘Inception’ revels in creative confusion  (Bill Fentum, Aug 3, 2010)
BOOK REVIEW: Methodism as a glorious ‘machine’  (David Mosser, Jul 16, 2010)
FILM REVIEW: Last ‘Toy Story’ adventure honors love, imagination  (Bill Fentum, Jul 13, 2010)
THEATER REVIEW:
‘Screwtape’ staged with devious skill
 (Mary Jacobs, Jul 13, 2010)
FILM REVIEW: ‘Please Give’ leaps into urban ethical dilemma for couple  (Bill Fentum, Jul 7, 2010)

Archived articles:
Search archive
http://www.cokesbury.com/forms/ProductDetail.aspx?pid=864043


http://new.gbgm-umc.org/about/us/ecg/umdf/


http://secure.umcom.org/store/product/Microsoft-Office-2010-Professional-Plus,690.htm


http://www.umcgiving.org/site/c.qwL6KkNWLrH/b.3833895/





Home UM News UMPortal Store
© 2010 UMR Communications